Unisem Agritech (544648)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹64.69 |
| Market Cap | ₹73.31 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.17 |
| ROCE | 38.98% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
Strengths
- ROCE of 38.98% indicates strong returns on capital employed.
- Latest reported figures imply a net margin of roughly 7.8% (₹4 Cr profit on ₹51 Cr sales), showing current profitability.
- P/E of 17.17 is not an extreme speculative multiple, though it offers no compensation for zero growth.
Concerns
- Sales growth and profit growth are both 0.00%, so there is no visible compounding engine.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests weak financial health and questionable earnings quality.
- Dividend yield is 0.00%, providing no income return to shareholders.
- Critical data—book value, debt/equity, promoter holding—is missing, so balance sheet safety and governance cannot be assessed.
AI Analysis
Unisem Agritech fails my first test: I must understand the business, but the ledger is incomplete. Sales are ₹51 Cr and net profit ₹4 Cr, yet reported growth is exactly 0.00%. A company that cannot grow revenue or profits in nominal rupee terms—especially in an age of rising agricultural input demand—has no compounding engine. At ₹64.69, market cap ₹73 Cr, P/E 17.17 means I am paying 17 times stagnant earnings. Graham would call that speculative unless the balance sheet shows cash and conservatism; here book value, debt/equity, and promoter holding are all unavailable. I cannot judge financial strength, and the Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 reinforces that concern: weak scores suggest poor profitability quality, leverage stress, or inefficiency. The one bright spot is ROCE 38.98%, which implies capital is used efficiently at this level. But a high return with zero growth and no dividend yield (0.00%) leaves shareholder returns dependent solely on multiple expansion or an eventual growth burst—neither is visible today. For a small-cap at ₹73 Cr, lack of information is itself a risk. I would rather wait until management provides audited book value, debt structure, ownership details, and a track record of growing sales. Without those, no intelligent margin of safety can be computed. This is a zero-growth company at 17 times earnings; it is not a bargain, it's a hope. I pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer