Riddhi Display (544640)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹38.22 |
| Market Cap | ₹33.02 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.47 |
| ROCE | 40.47% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 43.05% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0.77% |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Low P/E of 6.47 and PEG of 0.20 suggest attractive valuation relative to 43.05% profit growth.
- ROCE of 40.47% indicates highly efficient use of capital.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to solid underlying financial health.
- Latest quarter shows strong profitability: ₹3 crore net profit on ₹14 crore sales.
Concerns
- Sales growth is only 0.77%, so earnings growth is driven by margin expansion rather than revenue growth.
- Implied net margin of roughly 21% is high for a houseware business and may not be sustainable without a durable moat.
- No dividend yield, so shareholders depend entirely on capital appreciation.
- Critical data missing — book value, debt/equity, promoter holding, and ROE — making balance sheet risk hard to assess.
AI Analysis
Let me start with what I like: a P/E of 6.47 on a market cap of just ₹33 crore is cheap by any standard. A PEG ratio of 0.20 suggests the market is paying very little for 43.05% profit growth. The ROCE of 40.47% is remarkable, and a Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9 indicates improving financial health. The latest quarter's ₹14 crore sales producing ₹3 crore net profit shows either pricing power or strong cost discipline. But Buffett would ask: can Riddhi Display sustain this? Sales growth is only 0.77% — the top line is stagnant. This profit growth is not coming from selling more; it is coming from margin expansion, which has a ceiling. In houseware, a competitive, low-moat industry, a 21-22% net margin is unusually high and may not be durable. There is no dividend yield, so my return depends entirely on future earnings growth. Far more troubling is what I cannot see: no book value, no debt-to-equity ratio, no promoter holding, no ROE. I cannot analyze balance sheet risk or whether promoters have skin in the game. Graham would demand a margin of safety beyond a low P/E; here, the missing data strips away that protection. Is this a fast grower? The earnings momentum and PEG suggest yes, but the flat revenue and microcap size make it a candidate, not a conviction. I would need several quarters of growth in both sales and profits, plus full financial disclosure, before committing capital. At ₹38.22, it is an interesting watchlist item, but not yet a compounder I can trust.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer