Valplast Technol (544565)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹50 |
| Market Cap | ₹98.14 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.06 |
| ROCE | 24.66% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Sector | Construction |
Strengths
- Latest quarter profitable: ₹35 Cr sales and ₹3 Cr net profit, implying ~8.6% net margin.
- ROCE of 24.66% indicates efficient use of capital, if the balance sheet holds up.
- P/E of 16.06 is not extreme for a profitable small-cap.
- Market cap of ₹98 Cr leaves room for growth if execution improves.
Concerns
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests weak financial health and possible red flags.
- Reported sales growth and profit growth are 0.00%, and dividend yield is 0.00%, providing no return cushion.
- Critical disclosures missing: book value, ROE, debt/equity, promoter holding, and 52-week range.
- Civil construction is cyclical and competitive, with no apparent durable moat.
AI Analysis
Let me start with what the numbers actually tell me. Valplast Technol is a civil construction company with a market cap of ₹98 Cr, price ₹50, and a P/E of 16.06. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹35 Cr and net profit of ₹3 Cr, so the net margin is around 8.6%. ROCE is 24.66%, which is genuinely strong on its face. But I cannot value a business on one quarter and one ratio. The reported sales and profit growth are both 0.00%, so there is no proven track record of expansion. The Piotroski F-Score is only 3 out of 9, which immediately makes me suspicious of the financial health underneath the headline profit. There is no dividend yield, so the investor receives no cash return while waiting. More troubling, key data are missing: no book value, no ROE, no debt/equity, no promoter holding, no 52-week range. Benjamin Graham always insisted on adequate information; without it, I cannot estimate intrinsic value or margin of safety. Civil construction is also a cyclical and competitive business. I see no durable moat, no pricing power, and no recurring revenue. At 16 times earnings with no reported growth, the valuation does not compensate me for these risks. For an Indian retail investor, this looks like a speculative small-cap, not an investment. I would wait for more years of financial statements, better disclosure, and proof that the business can generate steady cash flows before putting any money in.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer