Rukmani Devi Gar (544552)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹101 |
| Market Cap | ₹89.65 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 11.84 |
| ROCE | 19.13% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Sector | Food Products |
Strengths
- P/E of 11.84 is not demanding if earnings are sustainable
- ROCE of 19.13% suggests decent capital efficiency at the operating level
- Latest quarter sales of ₹302 crore indicate a meaningful scale of operations
- Net profit of ₹5 crore shows the company is at least profitable
- Market cap of ₹90 crore keeps the stock within small-cap exploration range
Concerns
- Net margin is extremely thin at about 1.6% of quarterly sales
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 points to weak underlying financial health
- Sales growth and profit growth are 0.00%, indicating stagnation
- No dividend, no ROE, no book value, no debt data, and no promoter holding details create significant transparency issues
AI Analysis
Rukmani Devi Gar presents a puzzle. At ₹101, the entire company is valued at only ₹90 crore, and the trailing P/E of 11.84 looks cheap at first glance. But cheapness is not the same as value. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹302 crore against a net profit of just ₹5 crore — that is a net margin of roughly 1.6%. This tells me the business earns very little on every rupee of revenue, a classic sign of a low-moat, commodity-like food processor with limited pricing power. ROCE of 19.13% looks respectable, but with no return on equity, book value, debt, or promoter holding disclosed, I cannot validate the balance sheet or governance. I dislike investing in ignorance. The Piotroski F-score of only 3/9 reinforces my caution. It suggests weak profitability or efficiency signals, not a company showing improving financial health. Sales growth and profit growth are both reported at 0.00%, and the dividend yield is zero. So I am being asked to pay 11.84 times earnings for a stagnant, ultra-low-margin business with poor fundamental scores. In Buffett's terms, this is a case where the numbers do not tell enough of a story, and what they do tell is not compelling. I would want to know why margins are so thin, whether management owns a meaningful stake, and how much debt sits on the balance sheet. Until then, this belongs in the too-hard pile. A good business is wonderful; a cheap pile of revenue without a moat can easily become a value trap.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer