Monarch Surve. (544453)

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

When I see a business growing sales by 44.41% and profits by 48.34%, yet trading at a P/E of 7.34, my interest is immediately piqued. Monarch Surve appears to be compounding at a healthy clip while the market is pricing it like a mundane consulting firm. The ROCE of 46.40% is exceptional — it tells me the company is generating strong returns on the capital employed, which is often a hallmark of a business with some pricing power or efficient operations. The Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 supports the fundamental quality, indicating solid profitability, improving margins, and prudent financial health. With a PEG ratio of 0.16, the valuation looks deeply attractive if the growth is sustainable. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹73 Cr and net profit of ₹14 Cr; annualizing that throws off roughly ₹56 Cr in earnings, even higher than the trailing earnings implied by the current P/E. That creates a margin of safety, provided the growth is real and not a one-time spike. Still, I must be honest about what I don't know. Book value, debt/equity, ROE, and promoter holding are not available, so I cannot fully assess the balance sheet or insider commitment. A zero dividend yield is acceptable for a growing company that reinvests, but it also means shareholders are entirely dependent on capital appreciation. Consulting is a competitive field, and a single-client concentration or project-based revenue can make reported growth lumpy. I would not buy purely on these numbers; I would want audited financials, cash flow statements, and a clearer picture of the moat. But the figures I have are certainly a strong starting point for deeper research.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer