Spinaroo Comm. (544392)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹62.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹43.99 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 34.91 |
| ROCE | 18.54% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -27.87% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -7.85% |
| Sector | Paper, Forest & Jute Products |
Strengths
- Reported ROCE of 18.54% suggests some return on capital employed, at least at the operating level.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹19 crore provide a small operating base.
- Market cap of ₹44 crore means the company is small and could grow from a low base.
- Zero dividend means no cash is being paid out while the business works through its troubles.
Concerns
- Sales declined 7.85% and profit declined 27.87%; latest quarter net profit is ₹0 crore.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health.
- P/E of 34.91 is expensive for a company with falling earnings and no current quarterly profit.
- Promoter holding, book value, and debt/equity are undisclosed, making margin-of-safety analysis impossible.
AI Analysis
Looking at Spinaroo Comm., I am reminded why I keep most small caps in the too-hard pile. The company operates in paper and paper products, a commodity business where pricing power is often weak and cycles are real. The numbers confirm the cycle is against it: sales fell 7.85% and profits fell 27.87%. In the latest quarter, sales were ₹19 crore but net profit was ₹0 crore. A business earning nothing at the bottom of a cycle can be exciting if it has a strong balance sheet, but here debt/equity is not disclosed, book value is unavailable, and the Piotroski F-Score is only 3 out of 9. That score tells me financial health is weak, not a candidate for margin of safety. The reported ROCE of 18.54% looks respectable, but with profit growth deeply negative and no dividend, I cannot rely on it. A P/E of 34.91 is meaningless for a company whose latest quarterly profit is zero; paying 34.91 times falling earnings on a ₹44 crore market cap is speculation, not investment. There is no demonstrated moat. The promoter holding is not disclosed, which bothers me. I like to know who is running the show and how much they have at stake. Paper can be cyclical, so maybe an investor with deep industry expertise could time a recovery. I have no such edge here. Benjamin Graham would demand a margin of safety—quantifiable assets and predictable earnings. This company offers neither. At best, it is a possible cyclical recovery, but only after I see several quarters of profit recovery, stable or growing sales, and clear disclosure of debt and ownership. Until then, I will politely pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer