Identixweb (544388)
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹69 |
| Market Cap | ₹72.05 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.68 |
| ROCE | 34.33% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 31.98% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 22.72% |
| Sector | IT - Software |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Looking at Identixweb, I see a small software firm trading at ₹69 with a market cap of just ₹72 crore. At 16.68 times earnings, it is not expensive, and with profit growth near 32% and sales growth near 23%, the PEG ratio of 0.61 suggests the market is paying less than the growth rate. That is interesting, but I must be careful: small numbers can be misleading. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹6 crore and net profit of ₹2 crore—meaningful margins, but a tiny base. A 34.33% ROCE is excellent; it tells me capital is being deployed efficiently. The Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 also points to a healthy financial position, though I don't have debt or book value figures to confirm. As Graham would say, the lack of data on promoter holding and book value prevents me from sleeping easy. I also note there is no dividend, so the return must come entirely from business growth and eventual earnings power. This is a fast grower in a competitive software services space, where moats can be shallow. I would want to know whether the growth is coming from repeat clients, IP, or one large project. For a ₹72 crore company, even one client loss can hurt. Still, at this price, the odds appear reasonable: strong ROCE, rising profits, and a P/E below the growth rate. But I would not build a large position without more transparency; I would keep this on my watchlist and track quarterly order flow, client concentration, and cash conversion.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer