Swasth Foodtech (544368)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹18.6 |
| Market Cap | ₹10.89 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 13.63% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -243.41% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 12.96% |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
Strengths
- Topline growth of 12.96% shows demand momentum
- Latest quarter sales of ₹100 Cr indicates meaningful operating scale despite the tiny market cap
- Positive ROCE of 13.63% suggests some underlying capital efficiency before interest and taxes
- Sales growth provides potential operating leverage if the company can return to profitability
Concerns
- Net loss of ₹3 Cr in the latest quarter; profit growth of -243.41% shows deteriorating bottom line
- P/E and book value unavailable; with negative earnings, conventional valuation is impossible
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak financial health across profitability and efficiency metrics
- Zero dividend and undisclosed promoter/debt details limit accountability and transparency
AI Analysis
Look, when I see a business with a ₹11 crore market cap but ₹100 crore in quarterly sales, my first thought is not 'bargain'—it's 'what am I missing?' Swasth Foodtech is in agricultural products, a commodity business with little pricing power. In the latest quarter, it lost ₹3 crore; profit growth of -243.41% tells me the loss has widened materially from the prior period. A negative P/E is meaningless. Benjamin Graham would insist on positive earnings and a book value I can evaluate. Here I have neither. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 reflects weak financial health—this is not a company screaming quality. Yes, sales grew 12.96%, and ROCE is positive at 13.63%, but a company can grow sales and still destroy value if margins stay negative. With no dividend, no promoter holding disclosed, and no debt/equity data, I cannot judge who is steering the ship or how much leverage is hidden. At ₹18.60, the market is pricing in failure or distress. My rule is simple: avoid businesses where the numbers are this murky and the earnings are negative. I would put this in the 'too hard' pile. If management can show consistent positive quarterly profits, visible book value, and a clean balance sheet, I might revisit. But until then, capital preservation matters more than a low share price. In farming, you wait for the right harvest; in investing, you wait for the right margin of safety. This is not it.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer