Landmark Global (544341)

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Low trailing P/E of 6.99 at ₹33.42 with a ₹69 Cr market cap
• Latest quarter remains profitable: ₹16 Cr sales and ₹2 Cr net profit
• ROCE of 28.83% suggests decent return on capital employed

Concerns

• Sales fell 13.14% and profit fell 61.42%, showing sharp deterioration
• Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health
• No dividend and missing data on book value, debt/equity, and promoter holding limit analysis
• Travel services business likely has low moat and high cyclicality

AI Analysis

Landmark Global reminds me of a business that looks cheap but deserves suspicion. At ₹33.42, the market cap is only ₹69 Cr, and the trailing P/E of 6.99 seems attractive until you see that earnings have collapsed by 61.42% while sales fell 13.14%. A low multiple on falling earnings is not value; it is often a value trap unless the business stabilises. Travel-related services generally lack a durable moat: customers are price-sensitive, entry barriers are low, and demand is vulnerable to external shocks. The latest quarter shows ₹16 Cr in sales and ₹2 Cr in profit, so there is still some earning power, and ROCE of 28.83% is interesting. But without book value, debt/equity, or promoter holding data, I cannot judge the balance sheet or whether management has enough skin in the game. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 is a red flag; it signals weak financial health. Graham would demand a margin of safety, and here the safety is missing. No dividend means the shareholder depends entirely on price appreciation. This looks like a cyclical business whose earnings may be near a low, or a deteriorating operation. I would need several quarters of stable sales, protected margins, and stronger fundamental signals before putting money to work. For now, this is a 'no' for me. I prefer predictable earning power to a cheap-looking number.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer