Jungle Camps (544304)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹42.41 |
| Market Cap | ₹65.73 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.27 |
| ROCE | 14.51% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
Strengths
- Latest quarter shows ₹8 Cr sales and ₹2 Cr net profit, implying a healthy 25% net margin.
- ROCE of 14.51% indicates reasonable capital efficiency if not excessively leveraged.
- P/E of 16.27 is not extreme in absolute terms.
- Small ₹66 Cr market cap leaves room for potential growth if operations stabilise.
- Listed on NSE/BSE offers accessibility and market discipline.
Concerns
- Reported sales growth and profit growth are both 0.00%, yet the stock trades at 16.27 times earnings.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 points to weak financial fundamentals.
- Critical data is missing: no book value, P/B, ROE, debt/equity, or promoter holding, making proper Graham analysis impossible.
- No dividend yield means shareholders get no income while waiting for uncertain appreciation.
AI Analysis
Jungle Camps is a small hotel operator—₹66 crore market cap, ₹42.41 share price. Graham would start with the balance sheet, but I cannot: no book value, no debt-equity ratio, no ROE, no promoter holding. Without the basic details, any valuation is guesswork. What I do see is a latest quarter with ₹8 crore sales and ₹2 crore net profit—a 25% margin, which is good if repeatable. But the reported sales and profit growth are both zero, and the Piotroski F-score is just 3 out of 9, suggesting weak financial health. A zero-growth hotel business deserves a cyclical discount, not a 16.27 P/E. ROCE of 14.51% is respectable, but without knowing leverage, I cannot trust it. There is also no dividend, so the investor is completely dependent on price appreciation and business improvement. Is there a moat? In Indian hotels and resorts, brand, location and scale matter; a ₹66 crore company rarely has any of those in durable form. This looks like a cyclical, commodity-asset business, not a wonderful franchise. Maybe the latest quarter's profit is the start of a turnaround, but one quarter is not evidence. Buffett would say: 'It is far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.' Here I am not even sure if I am buying a fair company. The price is not obviously distressed, and the data is too thin. I will keep Jungle Camps on the watch list, but only after management provides full financials, a healthy balance sheet, and a track record of sustained profitability.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer