Forbes Precision (544186)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 36/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹362.75
Market Cap₹1,871.59 Cr
P/E Ratio25.09
ROCE24.96%
ROE17.95%
Dividend Yield3.83%
Profit Growth-24.87%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth12.12%
52-Week Range₹103.15 — ₹362.75
SectorIndustrial Manufacturing
Book Value₹30.26

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me start with the numbers that matter. Forbes Precision earns a return on equity of 17.95% and a return on capital employed of 24.96%. Those are good numbers; they suggest a business that can deploy capital without destroying value. Sales grew 12.12%, and last quarter it booked ₹64 Cr of revenue and ₹6 Cr of net profit. So the engine is running. But then I look at the owner's earnings: total profit fell 24.87% even as sales rose. That tells me margins are being squeezed, from competition, cost pressure, or both. Graham would never pay 25.09 times trailing earnings for a business whose profits are falling. The price-to-book ratio of 11.99 against a book value of ₹30.26 is especially rich. You are paying nearly twelve rupees for every rupee of net assets. The stock has moved from ₹103.15 to ₹362.75, a three-fold run, so the market has already cast its vote. At this price, with a Piotroski score of 4/9, I see more risk than reward. The dividend yield of 3.83% is comforting, but I want to know if earnings can cover it after a 24.87% profit drop. The PEG ratio of 2.07 tells me the growth is not cheap. I also have to note that debt/equity and promoter holding are not available; in an industrial business, hidden leverage can be fatal, and promoter skin in the game matters. This is a decent industrial company, but a poor stock at this price. I would wait patiently for either a margin recovery, better financials, or a much lower price. A business can be wonderful and still be a bad investment if you overpay. My circle of competence says: do not chase.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer