Finelistings Tec (544173)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹55.7 |
| Market Cap | ₹20.66 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -32.56% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -52.42% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -61.56% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹10.37 — ₹55.7 |
| Sector | Retailing |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Buffett here: a good business earns good returns on capital while reinvesting at high rates. Finelistings Tec does none of that today. Last quarter it did ₹5 Cr in sales and lost ₹2 Cr—that's a 40% negative margin. Over the year, sales fell 61.56% and losses widened by 52.42%. This is a shrinking, cash-burning operation, not a franchise with a moat. ROCE is -32.56%, meaning capital employed is being destroyed. The Piotroski F-Score is 2/9, a score that has historically flagged deep financial distress. Valuation is impossible to compute on earnings because there are none; the P/E of 0.00 is simply a placeholder. I also don't know book value, debt-equity ratio, or promoter holding. In Graham's language, without these facts I cannot put a margin of safety around intrinsic value. The stock trades at ₹55.70, at the top of its 52-week range of ₹10.37-₹55.70. That looks like speculation, not investment. In Indian e-retail, scale and unit economics separate winners from value traps. Finelistings has ₹5 Cr quarterly sales—too small to suggest competitive scale—and a -32.56% ROCE. It may one day become a turnaround if management stabilises revenue and cuts losses. But I don't invest 'maybe'. I need evidence: positive cash flow, rising F-score, disclosed promoter ownership, and a clear path to breakeven. Until then, this is a trade, not an investment. I would happily watch from the sidelines.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer