Varyaa Creations (544168)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹73.26 |
| Market Cap | ₹36.33 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 33.33 |
| ROCE | 6.61% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 6.45% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -37.83% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹24.02 — ₹73.26 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Latest quarter shows ₹10 Cr sales with ₹1 Cr net profit, implying a healthy ~10% quarterly net margin.
- Profit grew 6.45% despite a sharp sales decline, suggesting some cost discipline or margin improvement.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates reasonably solid recent financial health for a small-cap.
- Current price is at the 52-week high, showing market confidence in the story.
Concerns
- Sales declined 37.83%, a severe top-line deterioration for a small business.
- P/E of 33.33 and PEG of 5.17 leave no margin of safety for modest 6.45% earnings growth.
- ROCE of only 6.61% is poor and signals weak capital efficiency.
- No dividend, and key data like book value, debt/equity and promoter holding are unavailable.
AI Analysis
Varyaa Creations operates in gems, jewellery and watches, a business I have always approached warily because brand trust and cost advantages matter more than financial engineering. Looking at the figures, I see a very small enterprise: market cap of only ₹36 Cr, latest quarter sales of ₹10 Cr and net profit of ₹1 Cr. That gives a roughly 10% quarterly net margin, which is encouraging, but it is just one quarter. The underlying trend is troubling: sales have declined 37.83%, even while profit grew 6.45%. That tells me the earnings improvement may come from cost cuts or base effects, not from growing customer demand. In Graham's language, earnings should be a function of a healthy business, not a shrinking top line with adjusted margins. ROCE of 6.61% is poor; I can get better returns without taking jewellery inventory risk. Valuation makes things worse: P/E of 33.33 and PEG of 5.17. For 6.45% profit growth, I would not pay more than 10 to 12 times earnings, and even then only with a strong balance sheet. But I lack book value, debt/equity, promoter holding, and ROE. No dividend means the small shareholder gets nothing while waiting. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 offers some comfort about recent fundamentals, but it is not an investing thesis. The stock is at its 52-week high of ₹73.26, so Mr Market is optimistic. I need evidence of a genuine sales turnaround, sustained margins, and much better capital efficiency before this becomes a margin-of-safety opportunity.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer