Jasch Gauging (544112)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹720.4 |
| Market Cap | ₹326.7 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 14.8 |
| ROCE | 24.34% |
| ROE | 18.77% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% |
| Profit Growth | -7.5% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 7.15% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹433 — ₹720.4 |
| Sector | Industrial Manufacturing |
| Book Value | ₹196.67 |
Strengths
- ROE of 18.77% and ROCE of 24.34% indicate strong capital efficiency
- P/E of 14.80 is reasonable for a profitable industrial products company
- Latest quarter net profit margin of about 21% shows pricing power or cost discipline
- Dividend yield of 1.93% provides some income while waiting for growth
Concerns
- Profit growth is negative at -7.50% despite positive sales growth of 7.15%
- Piotroski F-score of 4/9 signals weak fundamental health
- P/B of 3.66 and PEG of 2.07 leave little margin of safety at ₹720.40
- Debt/Equity and promoter holding data are unavailable, making financial and governance assessment difficult
AI Analysis
Let me look at Jasch Gauging with a cold eye. At ₹720.40, the market cap is ₹327 Cr and the P/E is 14.80. That is not obviously expensive for an industrial products company. Return on equity at 18.77% and ROCE at 24.34% tell me this business has historically earned good returns on capital. A dividend yield of 1.93% offers some comfort. But as Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Book value is ₹196.67, so I am being asked to pay 3.66 times net worth. That premium has to be justified by growth. What do I see? Sales grew only 7.15% and profits fell 7.50%. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 is a red flag; it suggests financial health is deteriorating, not improving. PEG of 2.07 reinforces that the market is paying more than the growth rate deserves. The latest quarter shows ₹14 Cr sales and ₹3 Cr net profit, a strong margin, but one quarter does not make a trend. The stock sits at the top of its 52-week range, ₹433 to ₹720.40, so investor expectations are already high. Benjamin Graham would demand a margin of safety. At 3.66 times book, with falling profit, weak financial score, and incomplete data, I do not see that margin. This is a profitable small-cap, but it is not a bargain. I would need stable profit growth, better fundamentals, and a lower entry price before committing my capital.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer