Brisk Technovisi (544101)
Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹131 |
| Market Cap | ₹26.2 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 26.79 |
| ROCE | 18.75% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 4% |
| Profit Growth | -49.4% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 26.22% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹65 — ₹131 |
| Sector | IT - Hardware |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let's start with what the numbers tell me. Brisk Technovisi sells computers hardware and equipments, a business I struggle to find a durable moat in. Sales grew 26.22%, and ROCE of 18.75% is respectable, but profit fell 49.40% and the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹0 Cr. That is a serious warning sign: revenue without profit is not wealth creation. At ₹131, the market cap is just ₹26 Cr, and the trailing P/E of 26.79 is not cheap for a company whose earnings are shrinking. The so-called PEG of 1.02 is built on sales growth, not profit growth; with profits down 49.40%, that PEG is misleading. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests weak financial health. I also lack book value, debt-to-equity, and promoter holding data, so I cannot judge the balance sheet or whether promoters are aligned with minority shareholders. A 4.00% dividend yield sounds attractive, but with net profit at zero in the latest quarter, I would question whether that dividend is sustainable. The stock trades near the top of its 52-week range of ₹65 to ₹131, but in Graham's words, the market is a weighing machine in the long run. In a competitive hardware business, I need a margin of safety, not momentum. Brisk Technovisi will have to prove it can convert sales growth into real earnings before I can call it a sound investment. Until I see margin recovery and consistent profitability, I would remain cautious and demand a much lower price.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer