Bright Outdoor (543831)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 21/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹449.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹666.06 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 44.78 |
| ROCE | 15.71% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% |
| Profit Growth | 10.28% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 9.26% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹310.05 — ₹450 |
| Sector | Media |
Strengths
- Latest quarter profitable: sales ₹63 Cr, net profit ₹10 Cr, implying a healthy net margin.
- ROCE of 15.71% indicates decent capital efficiency.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests sound operating and balance-sheet fundamentals.
- Positive growth: sales up 9.26% and profit up 10.28%.
Concerns
- Expensive valuation: P/E of 44.78 and PEG of 4.58 are far ahead of ~10% underlying growth.
- Negligible dividend yield of 0.12% offers no cash return or downside support.
- FairStock Score of 20/100 flags the stock as risky.
- Critical data missing: P/B, book value, ROE, debt/equity, and promoter holding prevent a full Graham-style safety check.
AI Analysis
Let me begin with what I like: Bright Outdoor is a profitable business. In the latest quarter, it earned ₹10 Cr on sales of ₹63 Cr, and its ROCE of 15.71% shows that the capital employed is earning a reasonable return. The Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 also tells me that the underlying financials are not deteriorating. That is not nothing. But value is about price paid. At ₹449.90, the market caps this company at ₹666 Cr. Paying 44.78 times earnings for a business growing profits at 10.28% is, in Graham's phrase, speculation dressed as investment. The PEG ratio of 4.58 makes the overvaluation clear: you are paying more than four years of growth upfront. With a dividend yield of only 0.12%, the investor gets almost no cash return while waiting for that growth to arrive. I am also troubled by what is missing. There is no book value, no P/B, no debt-to-equity ratio, no promoter holding. I cannot judge the balance sheet or know if management has skin in the game. The FairStock score of 20/100 calls the stock risky, and I agree. The price sits at the top of its 52-week range, just one rupee below the high, leaving very little margin of safety. Benjamin Graham would not buy at the top of the range based on a single quarter's momentum. This is a slow grower wearing a fast-growth label. At a reasonable price, it might deserve attention. At this price, I would rather watch and wait.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer