Amanaya Ventures (543804)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹21.17 |
| Market Cap | ₹8.99 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 34.42 |
| ROCE | 7.93% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -37.04% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -24.23% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹13.73 — ₹22.8 |
| Sector | Non - Ferrous Metals |
Strengths
- Trailing P/E of 34.42 implies the company is still nominally profitable despite the sharp profit decline.
- Latest quarterly sales of ₹15 Cr against a ₹9 Cr market cap indicate meaningful business activity; this is not a shell.
- Positive ROCE of 7.93% shows capital is not being fully destroyed, though the return is thin.
- Precious metals have enduring industrial and investment demand, so revenue can revive if prices or volumes improve.
Concerns
- Sales growth of -24.23% and profit growth of -37.04% show rapid deterioration; latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr.
- P/E of 34.42 is expensive for a shrinking, zero-margin business, especially with no dividend yield.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health and possible red flags.
- Book value, debt-to-equity, and promoter holding data are missing, making balance-sheet and governance assessment impossible.
AI Analysis
At ₹21.17, Amanaya Ventures carries a market cap of only ₹9 crore. But small size alone is not an advantage; it is dangerous when I cannot see the source of value. The business is in precious metals, a commodity area where a durable moat is rare. The figures confirm my worry: sales fell 24.23%, profit fell 37.04%, and the latest quarter reported net profit of ₹0 crore. A company with zero bottom line cannot justify a P/E of 34.42. Graham would ask for a margin of safety; I see none. ROCE is just 7.93%, barely above cost of capital. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 reinforces that this is not a financially robust business. There is no dividend yield, so the investor depends entirely on price appreciation, but with declining fundamentals, that is speculation, not investment. I do not invest based on charts. The 52-week range of ₹13.73 to ₹22.80 shows a volatile stock, and at ₹21.17 it sits near the top of that range. That makes the risk asymmetric to the downside. I also don't have book value, debt-to-equity, or promoter holding data. I cannot even assess the balance sheet. In Warren Buffett's language, an 'inadequate' information set is enough to say no. Precious metal businesses can do well in cycles, but this one is showing contraction, not expansion. At 34 times earnings for a shrinking, zero-margin, poor-scoring company, the price is not at all conservative. This is a pass for me. If I owned it, I would be looking for signs of improvement in sales, margins, and debt before holding further.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer