Goel Food (543538)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹173.8 |
| Market Cap | ₹330.92 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 4.19 |
| ROCE | 17.54% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -12% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 8.74% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹8.54 — ₹173.8 |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
Strengths
- Headline P/E of 4.19 looks optically cheap on trailing earnings.
- ROCE of 17.54% suggests reasonable efficiency on existing capital.
- Sales growth of 8.74% shows the business is still expanding on the top line.
- Price near ₹173.80 indicates strong market interest, improving liquidity for an eventual exit.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr on sales of ₹9 Cr, pointing to a margin collapse.
- Profit growth is -12.00% and the Piotroski F-Score is only 4/9, signalling weak financial health.
- Dividend yield is 0.00%, so there is no income cushion while waiting.
- Book value, ROE, debt/equity and promoter holding are not available, making the balance sheet and alignment impossible to verify.
AI Analysis
Whenever I see a P/E of 4.19, my first reaction is to ask why, not to celebrate. Goel Food trades at ₹173.80, a market cap of ₹331 Cr, and reported sales growth of 8.74%. That sounds fine, but profit fell 12%, and the latest quarter delivered sales of just ₹9 Cr with no net profit at all. A low multiple built on trailing earnings is worthless if the earnings are evaporating in front of you. The hotel and resort business is inherently cyclical. It has no durable moat unless it owns irreplaceable locations or brand pricing power; we have no evidence of either from these figures. ROCE of 17.54% is respectable, suggesting management has produced returns on capital above a typical cost of capital. But with 0.00% dividend yield, I receive nothing while I wait, and with debt/equity, book value, promoter holding and ROE all unavailable, I cannot judge the safety of that return or who is aligned with me. The Piotroski score of 4 out of 9 reinforces my caution: it is the kind of score that says financial condition is mediocre. The 52-week range is astonishing—₹8.54 to ₹173.80—and a stock that has appreciated this far is no longer a quiet cigar butt. A PEG of 0.48 is meaningless when profit growth is negative. As Graham said, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At ₹173.80 I might be paying for hope, not for demonstrated value. I would wait for evidence that the zero-profit quarter is temporary and for full disclosures before calling this a bargain.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer