Naapbooks (543351)

Fast Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹70
Market Cap₹66.44 Cr
P/E Ratio13.88
ROCE23.65%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth165.32%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth157.41%
52-Week Range₹71 — ₹193.95
SectorIT - Software

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹70, Naapbooks is a micro-cap software firm with a market cap of just ₹66 Cr. The first thing I look for is a durable competitive advantage. Here, I cannot pretend to see a wide moat; the data available are too thin. That said, the numbers that are available show a business executing well. Sales grew 157.41% and profit grew 165.32%, with the latest quarter showing ₹10 Cr in sales and ₹3 Cr in net profit. ROCE of 23.65% suggests management is deploying capital sensibly. A Piotroski F-score of 7/9 lends some comfort on financial health, though I do not have debt/equity, book value, or promoter holding data to fully judge balance-sheet quality. Valuation is the interesting part. At a P/E of 13.88 and a PEG of 0.09, the market is not paying much for this growth. But Graham would warn me: a single year's explosive growth can be misleading, especially in a small software company. The 52-week range is a red flag—₹71 to ₹193.95, and the stock now sits at ₹70, below the low end. That kind of collapse demands humility. There is no dividend to validate shareholder friendliness. I would only invest a very small amount, if at all, and only after studying promoter holding, cash flows, order book, and why the stock fell so far. Mr. Market seems to be offering a possible bargain, but size and data insufficiency make this a high-risk candidate. The numbers hint at a fast grower, but I need several more quarters of sustained growth and better disclosure before treating it as a serious Buffett-style compounder. A cheap price can always become cheaper in a small-cap, so I'd demand a margin of safety that the available figures cannot yet provide.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer