Waa Solar (541445)
Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹173 |
| Market Cap | ₹229.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.87 |
| ROCE | 3.22% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 737.93% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -38.73% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹40.9 — ₹173 |
| Sector | Power |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me slow down. A P/E of 6.87 and a PEG of 0.01 would make any value hunter's eyes widen, but Waa Solar's own numbers tell me not to get tempted. The market cap is ₹230 Cr, yet the latest quarter's sales are ₹9 Cr and net profit only ₹2 Cr. Even if annualized, that's roughly ₹8 Cr of profit—nowhere close to the earnings implied by a low single-digit P/E. So the reported profit growth of 737.93% must be a base-effect or non-operating event, not a normalised earning power. Meanwhile, sales have fallen 38.73%: the core business is shrinking, not growing. ROCE of 3.22% is well below what I would demand from a capital-intensive power generator. Power is a commodity; without a cost or regulatory advantage, there is no moat, and the figures do not show any margin of safety. The share price has run from ₹40.90 to ₹173.00, so Mr. Market has already celebrated. Zero dividend means I receive no cash while waiting for a story that the financials do not yet support. The Piotroski F-score of 6 is respectable, but it doesn't compensate for collapsing revenue and poor return on capital. As Graham said, 'The investor's chief problem—and even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself.' I must avoid the seduction of a low P/E built on an earnings spike. This is a possible turnaround, not a proven one. I need several quarters of stable sales, sustainable margins, and better ROCE before I can call it an investment.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer