Taylormade Renew (541228)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 43/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹496.8 |
| Market Cap | ₹551.1 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 28.46 |
| ROCE | 21.76% |
| ROE | 6.85% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 89.74% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -7.32% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹87.8 — ₹496.8 |
| Sector | Industrial Manufacturing |
| Book Value | ₹55.23 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
I wear Buffett-Graham lenses, so I ask: what am I getting and what am I paying? Taylormade Renew is a ₹551 Cr industrial-products company at ₹496.80, exactly its 52-week high and far above ₹87.80 low. That tells me Mr. Market is excited. The numbers are mixed. Five-year revenue CAGR of 141.16% is extraordinary, and latest quarter sales of ₹15 Cr produced ₹4 Cr net profit—a strong margin. Profit growth of 89.74% and PEG of 0.32 suggest growth may not be fully priced if it persists. ROCE of 21.76% is respectable, and Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 is okay. But I see cracks. Latest sales growth is -7.32%, so the fast growth has hit a pause. ROE is only 6.85%, meaning accounting book value is not compounding at high rates. A 6.85% ROE with 9x book is an uncomfortable pairing; I need to understand why ROCE is 21.76% while ROE is much lower. P/B of 9.00 means I pay ₹9 for each ₹1 of book value; P/E 28.46 is not Graham's bargain unless growth is durable. No dividend yield, and N/A debt/equity and promoter holding leave key checks blank. FairStock score 43/100 says mixed. The moat is not proven from these figures; industrial products can be competitive. I would call this a Fast Grower only if sales reaccelerate and profit quality holds. At this price, margin of safety is thin; I'd wait for evidence, not excitement.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer