Sanghvi Brands (540782)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹20 |
| Market Cap | ₹20.83 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.47 |
| ROCE | 21.89% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 261.54% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 12.8% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹7.5 — ₹20 |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
Strengths
- P/E of 8.47 is optically inexpensive for a company with positive reported earnings.
- ROCE of 21.89% suggests reasonably efficient use of capital.
- Sales growth of 12.80% shows a growing top line.
- Piotroski F-score of 7/9 indicates decent financial health across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹0 Cr means the reported earnings power is extremely thin.
- No book value, ROE, or debt-to-equity data makes the balance sheet risk unassessable.
- Microcap market cap of ₹21 Cr with undisclosed promoter holding raises liquidity and governance questions.
- No dividend and the cyclical hotel industry provide no income cushion for investors.
AI Analysis
At ₹20, Sanghvi Brands is a ₹21 crore microcap in a capital-hungry hotel industry. The headline P/E of 8.47 looks cheap, but I have learned that cheap can be a value trap if earnings quality is thin. Latest quarter shows sales of ₹6 crore and net profit of ₹0 crore—meaning the business has almost no quarterly profit cushion. A 261.54% profit growth number and PEG of 0.06 look striking, but they are meaningless when the base is near zero. Sales growth of 12.80% is decent, but it is not enough to make this a wonderful business yet. ROCE of 21.89% and a Piotroski F-score of 7/9 are encouraging; they suggest efficient capital use and improving financial health. However, I cannot compute book value, return on equity, or debt-to-equity from the data provided. Those are essential. Without promoter holding details and a clearer balance sheet, I must treat this as an incomplete picture. Hotels are cyclical, and small hotels are vulnerable to economic swings, competition, and need for continuous maintenance capex. The stock sits at its 52-week high of ₹20, up from ₹7.50, so the market has already repriced something. Paying nearly nine times earnings for a zero-profit quarter is not the margin of safety I demand. If the business can sustain 12-13% sales growth and convert it to real net profit in coming quarters, there is a potential growth story. But I would wait for more evidence, especially quarterly operating cash flow and a debt-equity number. In Graham’s words, price is what you pay; value is what you get. Here, I do not yet know the value.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer