Marg Techno-Proj (540254)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹28.3 |
| Market Cap | ₹17.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 65.95 |
| ROCE | 8.32% |
| ROE | 9.47% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 12.5% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 10.79% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹18.7 — ₹50.79 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹5.11 |
Strengths
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates decent financial health across profitability, leverage, and efficiency.
- Sales growth of 10.79% and profit growth of 12.50% show modest momentum.
- Positive ROE of 9.47% and ROCE of 8.32% show the business is earning, not merely consuming capital.
- Price has corrected from the 52-week high of ₹52.09 to ₹28.30, removing some speculative excess.
Concerns
- P/E of 65.95 and P/B of 5.54 are excessive for an ROE of 9.47%; the earnings yield is only about 1.5%.
- Latest quarter has net profit of ₹0 Cr, so current earnings power is negligible.
- PEG of 5.66 implies the 12.50% profit growth is nowhere near enough to justify the valuation.
- Zero dividend, no disclosed debt/equity, and no promoter holding data leave critical risk unquantified.
AI Analysis
I begin with valuation. Marg Techno-Proj is a micro-cap NBFC at ₹28.30 with a market cap of just ₹18 Cr. For that price I get roughly ₹5.11 of book value and, based on the P/E of 65.95, an initial earnings yield of only about 1.5%. That is a poor starting return. An NBFC should be judged on its return on equity; here ROE is 9.47%. Paying 5.54 times book for a business earning less than 10% on equity leaves me no margin of safety. The growth numbers — sales up 10.79% and profit up 12.50% — are respectable, but the PEG ratio of 5.66 tells me the growth is already more than fully priced. What really worries me is the latest quarter: sales of ₹2 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. The P/E is relying on historical earnings that are not showing up in the current quarter. This is a leveraged, credit-sensitive business, yet debt/equity and promoter holding are N/A; I cannot judge whether the balance sheet is safe or whether owners are aligned. There is no dividend, so I cannot wait passively for a return. The Piotroski F-score of 7/9 is the only positive signal, but it does not justify a 66 multiple. In Warren Buffett's terms, it is far better to buy a wonderful business at a fair price than an average business at a wonderful price. Here I am being asked to pay a wonderful price for an average business. I will wait for better data and a lower price.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer