Mitsu Chem Plast (540078)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹142.05 |
| Market Cap | ₹192.88 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 12.22 |
| ROCE | 10.41% |
| ROE | 12.42% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% |
| Profit Growth | 224.32% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 6.89% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹80.3 — ₹175.4 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹72.08 |
Strengths
- Trailing P/E of 12.22 and P/B of 1.97 provide a modest valuation for a small-cap if earnings are maintained.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals improving profitability and financial health.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹5 Cr on ₹86 Cr sales shows positive operating momentum.
- ROE of 12.42% and ROCE of 10.41% are reasonable, though not exceptional.
Concerns
- Profit growth of 224.32% against sales growth of only 6.89% is margin recovery, not durable top-line compounding.
- Debt/Equity is not available, so leverage and balance-sheet risk cannot be properly assessed.
- Promoter holding is not disclosed, leaving no visibility into management's skin in the game.
- Net margin around 5.8% in the latest quarter leaves a thin cushion if input costs or competition rise.
AI Analysis
As an investor, I search for businesses I can understand, with durable economics and a margin of safety. Mitsu Chem Plast is a small-cap packaging company with a market cap of ₹193 Cr. The stock trades at a trailing P/E of 12.22 and a price-to-book of 1.97, so the quoted price is not obviously insane. But a low price is not enough; the business must be sound. The headline profit growth of 224.32% excites, yet I immediately notice sales grew only 6.89%. That gap tells me this is a recovery in margins, not a compounder growing its top line. Latest quarter sales of ₹86 Cr and net profit of ₹5 Cr imply a thin net margin of about 5.8%, typical of a competitive packaging industry with limited pricing power. ROE of 12.42% and ROCE of 10.41% are respectable but not exceptional; they do not suggest a wide moat. I cannot see debt/equity or promoter holding, which troubles me. I would not buy without understanding leverage and insider ownership. The Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 is a point in favour, suggesting recent fundamentals are improving. The dividend yield is negligible at 0.19%, so returns must come from reinvestment and capital appreciation. At P/E 12.22, the market is cautious, and I should be too. The PEG ratio of 0.11 looks wonderful only if 224% profit growth is sustainable—it almost certainly is not. I would treat this as a possible turnaround, needing more quarters to prove margins and balance-sheet reliability. Buying here requires faith; I prefer to wait for evidence. Mr. Graham taught me to weigh facts, not hopes.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer