Jindal Leasefin (539947)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹48.43
Market Cap₹14.87 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-30.21%
ROE-17.67%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth0%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
52-Week Range₹35 — ₹80.62
SectorFinance
Book Value₹26.72

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me start with what I look for: a business that can put capital to work and generate consistently high returns. Jindal Leasefin does not come close. With an ROE of -17.67% and ROCE of -30.21%, every rupee of book value is being worked against the shareholder, not for him. The latest quarter shows sales and net profit of essentially ₹0 Cr, so there is no earnings engine. A P/E of 0.00 is meaningless; it is a sign of absence of profits. The price of ₹48.43 versus book value of ₹26.72 means I am being asked to pay ₹48.43 for ₹26.72 of net assets, or roughly 1.81 times book, for a business that is destroying value. Where is the margin of safety? There is none from these numbers. Some might call it an asset play because it is an investment company, but a true Graham asset play involves buying assets at a significant discount, not at a premium. The Piotroski score of 6/9 is the only bright spot, suggesting the balance sheet is not collapsing, but it does not make a good investment. There is no dividend yield, no growth in sales or profits, and with a market cap of only ₹15 Cr, this is a small, illiquid name. Promoter holding is not even available, so I cannot judge alignment. In Buffett’s language: it is a business with no moat, no earnings power, and poor capital allocation. The only rational reason to own this would be if the underlying investments are worth far more than the stated book and can be unlocked. That is not visible in the figures. I would keep this on the sidelines until it trades at a meaningful discount to book and demonstrates a credible plan to generate returns.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer