Sharanam Infra (539584)
Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.71 |
| Market Cap | ₹9.25 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 3.16 |
| ROCE | 13.46% |
| ROE | 48.77% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 1,000% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 1,254.55% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.19 — ₹0.71 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹0.2 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
I approach this the way Graham taught me: first protection of capital, then return. Sharanam Infra looks like a statistical bargain at ₹0.71, with a market cap of only ₹9 Cr and a P/E of 3.16. But cheap can be dangerous when the underlying business lacks a moat. This is a trading and distribution company, not a franchise with pricing power. Sales jumped 1254.55% and profit 1000%, and the latest quarter shows ₹24 Cr sales and ₹4 Cr net profit. Those are staggering numbers, and a Piotroski F-score of 7/9 hints at improving fundamentals. Yet I cannot ignore the inconsistencies. Book value is just ₹0.20, so despite the low P/E, I am paying 3.55 times stated book. ROE is 48.77%, but ROCE is only 13.46%—that gap tells me the equity return is being flattered by leverage or non-operating items, not by the business itself earning high returns on capital. There is no dividend, no promoter holding data, and the FairStock score is unavailable. For a ₹9 Cr microcap, that lack of transparency is a red flag. In trading and distribution, revenues can explode in one quarter and vanish the next. A zero PEG looks exciting, but it only makes sense if 1000% growth is repeatable, which is unlikely. I would need to see several more quarters of cash generation and stable margins before calling this an investment. It may be a speculative fast grower, but it is not a business I can confidently own.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer