Deep Diamond (539559)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹5.91 |
| Market Cap | ₹28.58 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.78 |
| ROCE | 5.28% |
| ROE | 29.37% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.41% |
| Profit Growth | 1,000% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1.65 — ₹10.29 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹1.54 |
Strengths
- Low reported P/E of 6.78 and an extremely low PEG of 0.01, if the earnings spike can be believed
- High reported ROE of 29.37% signals decent recent equity returns
- Dividend yield of 3.41% provides some cash return while waiting
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates moderate financial health
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹3 Cr is three times sales of ₹1 Cr, implying non-core or non-recurring earnings
- Sales growth is 0.00%, so profit growth of 1,000% is not from operational expansion
- P/B of 3.84 means paying nearly four times book value for a small, unproven microcap
- Promoter holding, debt/equity, and FairStock score are unavailable — a serious transparency problem
AI Analysis
At ₹5.91 with a market cap of only ₹29 Cr, the first thing I notice is the apparent cheapness: a P/E of 6.78 and a PEG of 0.01. But Graham taught me that numbers mean nothing without sustainability. Sales growth is flat at 0.00%, yet profit growth is reported at 1,000% — and the latest quarter shows sales of just ₹1 Cr but net profit of ₹3 Cr. A company cannot produce ₹3 Cr of operating profit on ₹1 Cr of jewellery sales. That profit is either exceptional, non-operating, or one-time. So the low P/E is not a bargain; it is a warning. The ROE of 29.37% looks dazzling, but ROCE is only 5.28%, which tells me the business earns poor returns on capital employed. I am also paying 3.84 times book value for a microcap in a highly competitive, cyclical gems and jewellery industry. There is no visible moat. The dividend yield of 3.41% offers some comfort, but it cannot compensate for questionable earnings quality. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some financial health, but promoter holding is N/A, debt/equity is N/A, and even the FairStock score says insufficient data. In Buffett's world, I need clarity and repeatability. This looks like a possible turnaround, but not yet a proven one. If the core business is not generating real profits, this is a value trap. I would wait, demand better disclosure, and watch whether sales ever support the earnings.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer