Uday Jewellery (539518)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹138 |
| Market Cap | ₹307.35 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16 |
| ROCE | 14.15% |
| ROE | 23.13% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -5.07% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 83.32% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹112.15 — ₹181 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹34.06 |
Strengths
- Return on equity is strong at 23.13%, indicating decent capital efficiency.
- Sales growth of 83.32% shows strong demand or business expansion.
- The company remains profitable with ₹4 crore net profit on ₹181 crore quarterly sales.
- P/E of 16.00 is not extreme if earnings can stabilize and grow.
- Positive book value of ₹34.06 provides some asset backing.
Concerns
- Profit declined 5.07% despite 83.32% sales growth, showing severe margin compression.
- Latest quarter net profit margin is only about 2.2% (₹4 crore on ₹181 crore), leaving little room for error.
- Price-to-book of 4.05 is expensive relative to book value of ₹34.06.
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests weak financial health; zero dividend means no cash return to shareholders.
AI Analysis
Let me look at Uday Jewellery as a business, not a ticker. The first thing that strikes me is the contradiction: sales grew 83.32%, yet profit actually fell 5.07%. In my experience, when revenue races ahead but earnings retreat, the quality of that growth is questionable. The latest quarter shows ₹181 crore in sales but only ₹4 crore in net profit—a margin of roughly 2.2%. That is a thin, competitive business, typical of jewellery retail but dangerous if inventory or gold prices turn. The return on equity of 23.13% looks nice, but I have to ask how much debt supports it. With debt/equity not disclosed and ROCE at only 14.15%, I cannot trust the leverage picture. Book value is ₹34.06, so at ₹138 I'm paying over 4 times book. For a commodity-like jeweller, that offers little margin of safety. A P/E of 16 is not outrageous, but a PEG of 0.19 looks seductive only if you believe the historic growth is sustainable—and the profit decline says otherwise. The Piotroski score of 4 out of 9 also warns me of financial strain. Zero dividend means I am depending entirely on share price appreciation, which is not a value investor's game. This may be a cyclical business benefiting from a strong sales push, but without stable earnings or a clear moat, I would rather watch from the sidelines. If I owned it, I'd monitor margins and working capital closely. But at this price, the market is already expecting a future that the latest numbers don't yet deliver.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer