Hawa Engineers (539176)
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹172.8 |
| Market Cap | ₹62.62 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 12.32 |
| ROCE | 14.55% |
| ROE | 11.32% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 283.33% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 21% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹63.4 — ₹172.8 |
| Sector | Industrial Manufacturing |
| Book Value | ₹54.12 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me look at Hawa Engineers. A market cap of ₹63 crore makes this a very small industrial company, and right away I know the margin for error is thin. At ₹172.80, the stock trades at 12.32 times earnings and 3.19 times book. Book value is ₹54.12, so the market is asking me to pay more than three times net assets for an ROE of only 11.32% and ROCE of 14.55%. That is not a pairing that makes me want to write a cheque. Sales are growing at 21%, and reported profit growth is a dazzling 283.33%, but I have to be careful with small bases. The latest quarter net profit is just ₹1 crore on ₹31 crore of sales—a margin around 3.2%. That is thin. A low PEG of 0.08 is attractive only if this growth is durable, and I have no evidence yet that it is. On the positive side, the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests the financial health has improved, and the lack of debt data is a gap I cannot ignore. The absence of a dividend means I must rely entirely on capital gains. The stock sits at its 52-week high of ₹172.80, up from a low of ₹63.40, so a lot of good news may already be priced in. In true Buffett fashion, I want a wonderful business at a fair price. Here I see a small, growing industrial firm, but with a premium price-to-book, modest return on equity, and incomplete disclosures around promoter holding and debt. I would keep it on the watchlist and wait for more data, or a better price, before acting.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer