Panth Infinity (539143)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹6.92 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.05 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 4.27 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | 57.25% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 734.23% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 229.07% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹6.12 — ₹15.01 |
| Sector | Diversified |
| Book Value | ₹3.99 |
Strengths
- P/E of 4.27 and PEG of 0.01 suggest extreme valuation cheapness
- ROE of 57.25% indicates strong return on book equity
- Sales growth of 229% and profit growth of 734% show powerful momentum
- Latest quarter profitable: ₹43 Cr revenue with ₹9 Cr net profit
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 points to generally sound fundamentals
Concerns
- ROCE is 0.00% and debt/equity is N/A, making true capital efficiency unclear
- Promoter holding is N/A, creating ownership and governance uncertainty
- The 'Diversified' label gives no visibility into the moat or earnings durability
- Zero dividend yield and a 52-week range of ₹6.12–₹15.01 leave the stock with little downside support
AI Analysis
At ₹6.92, Panth Infinity looks like a classic statistical bargain: a P/E of just 4.27, a PEG of 0.01, and a price-to-book of 1.73 against a book value of ₹3.99. But Graham taught me that a cheap price is never enough; I have to understand the business. Here, the label 'Diversified' tells me almost nothing. There is no clear moat, no pricing power, and no predictable earnings stream. The latest quarter shows ₹43 Cr of sales and ₹9 Cr of net profit, and the company has grown sales by 229% and profits by 734%. That kind of explosion is exactly what I distrust unless I can see how it was funded. ROCE is 0.00%, debt/equity is unavailable, and promoter holding is unavailable. That is a serious red flag: I don't know who controls it, how much capital is actually at work, or why returns on capital are blank. The 57.25% ROE looks superb, but a single good quarter or leverage can manufacture that number. The dividend yield is zero, so I receive no income while I wait. The stock trades near the bottom of its 52-week range, far below the ₹15.01 high. That may be the market's judgment, not an opportunity. Piotroski's score of 6/9 is acceptable, but it is not proof of durable economics. If this is a genuine fast grower with repeatable advantages, the price is absurdly cheap. If it is a cyclical or a shell posting one strong quarter, it is a trap. I need more clarity on debt, ownership, and capital allocation before I can act.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer