Abhinav Leasing (538952)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹2.04 |
| Market Cap | ₹10.3 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 10.4 |
| ROCE | 6.69% |
| ROE | 10.04% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 130.91% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -89.64% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.97 — ₹2.04 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹1.21 |
Strengths
- P/E of 10.40 and P/B of 1.69 are not demanding, with book value at ₹1.21.
- ROE of 10.04% is positive, and Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests several fundamentals are passable.
- Profit growth of 130.91% and a PEG of 0.08 reflect the low base; if sales stabilise, the earnings rebound might continue.
- Tiny ₹10 crore market cap means a genuine operational recovery can have a visible price impact.
Concerns
- Sales collapsed by 89.64%; latest quarter sales are just ₹1 crore and net profit is rounded to ₹0 crore, so operating scale is minimal.
- The 130.91% profit growth is from an extremely low base and is contradicted by shrinking revenue.
- No dividend is being paid, so investors get no cash return while the turnaround is unproven.
- Debt/equity and promoter holding are N/A, leaving leverage and governance risks unassessed.
AI Analysis
When I look at Abhinav Leasing, I see a tiny NBFC with a market capitalisation of just ₹10 crore and a share price of ₹2.04. At 10.40 times earnings and 1.69 times book value, the market is not asking a rich price. But cheapness alone is not enough. The 89.64% fall in sales is a giant red flag. A business cannot shrink its top line and call itself healthy. The latest quarter tells the story: sales of only ₹1 crore and net profit of essentially ₹0 crore. Yes, reported profit grew 130.91%, but that is from an extremely low base, and the PEG ratio of 0.08 is misleading when revenue is collapsing. My style demands a durable earning power. Here, we have a 10.04% ROE and a Piotroski score of 6/9, which are mildly encouraging, but there is no discernible moat in a small NBFC competing against banks and larger financiers. Debt/equity is not available, so I cannot judge leverage, and promoter holding is unknown, which worries me on governance. The stock trades at the top of its 52-week range, so there is no crisis-price margin of safety. This looks like a possible turnaround, not a predictable stalwart. I would need several consecutive quarters of recovering sales, real profits, and clean receivables before deploying any capital. For a retail investor, this is a speculative watch-list item, not a buy-and-hold compounding machine.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer