Sellwin Traders (538875)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 3/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹27.26 |
| Market Cap | ₹612.7 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 21.59 |
| ROCE | 8.25% |
| ROE | 11.03% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -25% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -25.55% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹4.45 — ₹27.26 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹2.47 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Looking at Sellwin Traders, I ask first whether it's a business I understand and whether it has durable competitive advantage. We're told it's in diversified commercial services, but no clear moat appears in the data. The 5-year revenue CAGR of 290.70% is eye-catching, but latest sales growth is -25.55% and profit growth -25.00%, so the past sprint is not a reliable guide. Latest quarter sales ₹13 Cr and net profit ₹1 Cr; that's thin. ROE 11.03% and ROCE 8.25% are modest, ROCE below what I'd like for a quality business. Piotroski F-Score 3/9 tells me financial signs are weak. Debt/Equity is N/A, promoter holding N/A, so I cannot assess leverage or owner alignment. Valuation is the bigger problem: at ₹27.26, market cap ₹613 Cr, P/E 21.59 and P/B 11.04 against book value ₹2.47. I'm paying a premium multiple for declining current growth and a low FairStock score of 3/100. The 52-week range ₹4.45–₹27.26 shows a huge speculative run; no dividend yield. In Graham terms, there is no margin of safety at 11x book. Buffett would ask for a moat, consistent earnings, and capable stewardship; the data here doesn't provide that. This looks like a fast-growing revenue story now hitting a wall. I would watch whether sales and profits stabilize, whether ROCE improves above 8.25%, and whether book value grows. Until then, I'd put it in the too-hard pile.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer