Jeevan Scienti. (538837)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹50.96 |
| Market Cap | ₹80.69 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 2.8% |
| ROE | -2.52% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 1,000% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 52.44% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹57.15 — ₹93.9 |
| Sector | Healthcare Services |
| Book Value | ₹24.98 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me look at Jeevan Scienti through a Graham-Buffett lens. A market cap of ₹81 Cr and price ₹50.96 sounds small, not necessarily cheap. The book value is ₹24.98, so I am being asked to pay 2.04 times book. For that premium, I need evidence that the business earns a strong return on that book. Instead, ROE is negative at -2.52% and ROCE is only 2.80%. That fails any return-on-capital test. The P/E shows 0.00, meaning trailing earnings are not there to support a conventional valuation. Yes, the latest quarter shows sales of ₹19 Cr and net profit of ₹2 Cr, and reported sales growth of 52.44% with profit growth of 1000% looks exciting. But in small companies, percentage growth from a beaten-down base can flatter. One profitable quarter does not establish a durable earning machine. The Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 is the most encouraging thing here; it hints at improving financial health. Still, with zero dividend yield and promoter holding not disclosed, I cannot judge insider alignment. Debt/equity is absent, so I cannot fully assess balance-sheet risk. The 52-week range of ₹32.85 to ₹93.90 shows a stock that has been speculative. This looks like a potential turnaround: a small healthcare research/analytics company showing initial signs of life, but not yet a proven compounder. I need years of consistent profits, higher ROE, and honest disclosures before paying 2x book. I would wait for a margin of safety.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer