JMJ Fintech (538834)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹21.58 |
| Market Cap | ₹28.03 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 2.81 |
| ROCE | 31.23% |
| ROE | 44.09% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% |
| Profit Growth | 70.59% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 44.44% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹8.8 — ₹21.58 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹6.3 |
Strengths
- P/E of 2.81 with 70.59% profit growth gives a PEG of 0.05, suggesting exceptional value if growth persists.
- ROE of 44.09% and ROCE of 31.23% indicate very high capital efficiency and strong profitability.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to sound fundamentals across profitability, leverage, and operational efficiency.
- Sales growth of 44.44% and latest quarterly net profit of ₹2 Cr on ₹5 Cr revenue show strong momentum.
- Dividend yield of 1.75% provides a modest cash return while the stock remains cheap on earnings.
Concerns
- P/B of 3.43 means investors are paying a large premium over book value, leaving little margin of safety for a lender.
- Debt/Equity is not available, so leverage and true financial risk cannot be assessed reliably.
- Promoter holding is not disclosed, making governance and alignment unclear for a retail investor.
- Market cap of just ₹28 Cr and quarterly sales of ₹5 Cr indicate a very small, fragile operational base.
AI Analysis
Let's keep it simple. JMJ Fintech is a tiny NBFC with a market cap of just ₹28 crore, yet the numbers on the surface look extraordinary. It earned ₹2 crore net profit in the latest quarter against ₹5 crore of sales, with reported profit growth of 70.59% and sales growth of 44.44%. At ₹21.58, the P/E is 2.81, which seems far too cheap if earnings are sustainable. However, I must be skeptical. A P/B of 3.43 means the market is paying over three times book value for a lender; with book value at only ₹6.30, there is little margin of safety in the asset base. The ROE of 44.09% and ROCE of 31.23% are wonderful, but such returns on a small base can be misleading, especially when debt/equity is not disclosed. As Graham would ask: what are the real liabilities? Without promoter holding or balance-sheet leverage details, I cannot judge whether this is a gem or a trap. The Piotroski F-score of 7/9 is encouraging and indicates solid fundamentals, while the low PEG of 0.05 suggests the market has not yet priced in growth. But the 52-week range of ₹8.80 to ₹21.58 shows the stock has already climbed sharply, and Mr. Market loves small NBFCs for a while before reality arrives. The dividend yield of 1.75% is a small positive, but I would not buy based on that. I need years of consistent track record, not one or two quarters. This looks like a fast grower, but at this size and with missing disclosures, I would need a much deeper understanding of the loan book, asset quality, and funding sources before putting any money to work. In Buffett's terms: it is better to be certain about a good business than hopeful about a cheap one.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer