GCM Securit. (535431)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.95 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.08 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -14.12% |
| ROE | -4.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 102.1% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.5 — ₹0.99 |
| Sector | Capital Markets |
| Book Value | ₹1.26 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹0.95, GCM Securit is a classic Graham cigar butt: priced below book value, but with very little to light up. The market cap of ₹19 Cr against a stated book value of ₹1.26 per share gives a P/B of 0.75, so an investor gets ₹1.26 of net assets for every 95 paise spent. That sounds like a margin of safety. But my first rule is never to treat a cheap price as reason enough. The business shows no earnings: the latest quarter has ₹0 Cr sales and ₹0 Cr net profit, and the full picture confirms capital destruction with ROE of -4.30% and ROCE of -14.12%. A P/E of 0.00 is a red flag, not a bargain signal. Profit growth of 102.10% is meaningless from a nil or negative base. In stockbroking, a business without revenue and without competitive advantage is not a franchise; it is an empty shell. There is no dividend, and promoter holding is unavailable, so I cannot judge whether insiders are aligned. The 52-week range of ₹0.50 to ₹0.99 shows the market itself is unsure; at ₹0.95 we are near the top of a speculative range. Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is mediocre. This may be an asset play if the book value is real, convertible to cash, and protected from further losses. But with negative ROE and zero sales, book value is likely eroding. I would need audited financials, asset quality details, and a credible plan to unlock value. Until then, I would rather watch from the sidelines than hope.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer