Mystic Electron. (535205)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹4.69
Market Cap₹9.27 Cr
P/E Ratio7.33
ROCE3.87%
ROE2.98%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth102.38%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
52-Week Range₹2.67 — ₹4.69
SectorCommercial Services & Supplies
Book Value₹13.7

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹4.69, Mystic Electron is a micro-cap with a market cap of just ₹9 Cr. The first thing that catches my eye is the balance sheet: book value is ₹13.70, so the stock trades at 0.34 times book—a deep discount. The P/E of 7.33 also looks cheap. But Graham taught me that a bargain must be tested with questions. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. That is a red flag. A company with no current revenue or profit cannot be judged on trailing multiples; the earnings power is not visible. ROE is only 2.98% and ROCE is 3.87%, meaning the assets earn very little. The 102.38% profit growth may look attractive, but with 0.00% sales growth, it is probably a base-effect artifact. There is no dividend, so the investor's only return is from a re-rating or asset realisation. Promoter holding is not disclosed, which worries me; in a small trading company, promoter alignment matters enormously. On a positive note, the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests the company is not in obvious financial distress, and the PEG ratio of 0.07 is low—but only if the profit growth is sustainable, which the zero quarter makes doubtful. I would not call this a growing enterprise; it looks more like a potential asset play. At ₹4.69, the market is pricing in little hope beyond the book value. If the ₹13.70 book value is real, liquid, and honestly stated, there is a margin of safety. But low ROE and zero quarterly activity tell me this is not a compounding machine. I would want to see the full balance sheet and understand what those assets are before acting.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer