Alliance Integ. (534064)

FairStock Score: 1/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

Looking at Alliance Integ., I start with Graham's question: what am I getting for ₹1,025 Cr? The latest quarter shows sales of only ₹22 Cr and a net loss of ₹24 Cr. That means the market cap is many times quarterly sales, and there is no meaningful P/E because earnings are negative or nil (P/E 0.00). Price is ₹25.96, exactly at the 52-week high, against a 52-week low of ₹1.30. That is a speculative run, not a value bargain. The industry is iron and steel products—cyclical, capital-intensive, and usually lacking a durable moat unless it has cost advantages or niche products, which I cannot see here. Sales growth of 13.15% sounds decent, but the five-year revenue CAGR is only 0.81%, so the long-term record is essentially flat. Profit growth is -23.70%, and the latest quarter loss confirms the weakness. ROE of 38.58% catches the eye, but ROCE is -24.67%; if capital employed earns negative returns, the high ROE is likely misleading or distorted. Piotroski F-Score 3/9 and FairStock Score 1/100 (RISKY) reinforce financial fragility. No dividend yield. Debt/equity and promoter holding are N/A, so I cannot assess leverage or insider alignment. As Buffett, I want a moat, consistent earnings, and a margin of safety. As Graham, I want a bargain price. This looks like neither. The business quality is poor, financial health is weak, growth is inconsistent, and valuation appears stretched. I would put it in the too-hard pile and watch for actual profits, positive ROCE, and a more reasonable price before considering it.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer