Tamboli Industri (533170)

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Sales growth of 19.60% and profit growth of 30.36% give the company a healthy recent growth trajectory.
• PEG of 0.69 suggests the market may not be fully pricing in the earnings growth, assuming growth is sustainable.
• Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to improving fundamentals and decent financial discipline.
• Latest quarter shows real operating traction with sales of ₹22 Cr and net profit of ₹3 Cr.
• Stock is near the bottom of its 52-week range, so some bad news may already be reflected in the price.

Concerns

• P/B of 6.90 combined with ROE of only 7.04% means investors are paying a heavy premium for mediocre return on equity.
• Holding company structure with no promoter holding data and no debt/equity figure makes governance and capital allocation hard to assess.
• The reported numbers have an internal inconsistency: P/E of 17.22 implies much higher earnings than ROE and book value would suggest; this needs reconciliation.
• Dividend yield of just 0.67% provides little compensation while waiting, and the falling price from ₹211 to ₹126.45 signals market caution.

AI Analysis

Tamboli Industri calls itself a holding company, and that immediately lowers my enthusiasm. I prefer businesses I can understand, not a box of assets I have to guess at; I also don't see a clear moat in these figures. The numbers do not make me eager. At ₹126.45, the market cap is ₹128 Cr. The P/E of 17.22 means I am paying over 17 times earnings; the P/B of 6.90 means I am paying ₹6.90 for every rupee of book value, yet the company earns only 7.04% on equity and 9.54% on capital. That is a low return for such a high multiple. Growth looks excellent on paper: sales up 19.60%, profit up 30.36%, and a PEG of 0.69 suggests the market is not giving enough credit for that growth. The Piotroski score of 7/9 is also a positive signal. The latest quarter had ₹22 Cr of sales and ₹3 Cr of net profit, so the business is generating real numbers. But I have learned that a holding company can make profits look good while hidden costs and related-party risks lurk below. I also notice the stock is at the bottom of its 52-week range, down from ₹211 to ₹126.45; a falling price can be a friend, but only if I know why it fell. With promoter holding not disclosed, no debt/equity figure, and a dividend yield of just 0.67%, I lack the data to judge capital allocation. Ben Graham would say the price must give me a margin of safety. Here I pay 6.9 times book and 17.2 times earnings for a 7% ROE—there is no margin of safety. I would watch it, not buy it.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer