Tacent Projects (531887)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹20.47 |
| Market Cap | ₹7.19 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -160% |
| ROE | 2.32% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 25% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹34.95 — ₹44.58 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Market cap is only ₹7 Cr, so the absolute capital required is small if a genuine asset-based situation exists.
- Reported profit growth of 25%, though from a negligible base, shows some positive momentum in the numbers.
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 is mediocre but not an outright failing signal on the limited ratios provided.
- ROE of 2.32% is positive, however marginal, indicating nominal equity profitability rather than a large loss.
Concerns
- ROCE of -160% indicates severe capital destruction and a non-viable operating model.
- Latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹-0 Cr, meaning there is effectively no revenue engine.
- Critical data is missing—book value, P/B, debt/equity, and promoter holding—so no margin of safety can be calculated.
- Current price of ₹20.47 is below the reported 52-week low of ₹33.29, an anomaly that signals distress, illiquidity, or stale data.
AI Analysis
What am I looking at here? A ₹7 crore market cap, no meaningful revenue—latest quarter sales ₹0 Cr—and a return on capital employed of -160%. This is not a business; it is a corporate shell or a company in serious trouble. Buffett would say the most important thing is the economics of the business, and Tacent Projects' economics are dreadful. With zero sales, there is no moat, no pricing power, no customer loyalty, nothing. The reported 25% profit growth is irrelevant when the absolute base is zero; you cannot compound value from no revenue. ROE of 2.32% is trivial, and a negative ROCE means the capital inside the company is being destroyed, not built. The Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 is mediocre; it offers no evidence of fundamental strength. Valuation? At ₹20.47 the market cap is tiny, but a low price is not the same as value. The stock trades below its stated 52-week range of ₹33.29–₹44.58, which is a red flag for distress or illiquidity, not an opportunity. Graham would demand a margin of safety through hard assets and earnings power. We have neither: book value is N/A, P/B is N/A. I cannot calculate what I am buying. With zero dividend, no promoter holding data, and insufficient data on debt, this is a speculation, not an investment. If there are hidden assets, they must be proven with audited numbers. If a genuine turnaround emerges—real sales, positive operating cash flow, ROCE moving toward positive—then I might revisit. Today, in this screen, there is no margin of safety I can identify. Pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer