Prerna Infra. (531802)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹38.39 |
| Market Cap | ₹138.69 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 49.93 |
| ROCE | 2.36% |
| ROE | 1.84% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 322.5% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 118.25% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹19.03 — ₹38.39 |
| Sector | Realty |
| Book Value | ₹29.68 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 118.25% and profit growth of 322.50% show strong recent business momentum.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to improving financial fundamentals.
- Price-to-book of 1.29 with book value of ₹29.68 offers some asset backing, albeit at a premium.
- PEG of 0.23 appears optically cheap if current growth proves sustainable.
- Stock is at its 52-week high, reflecting strong market sentiment around the latest results.
Concerns
- ROE of 1.84% and ROCE of 2.36% are far too low for a business commanding a P/E of 49.93.
- Absolute scale is tiny: latest quarterly sales are only ₹3 Cr and net profit ₹1 Cr, against a ₹139 Cr market cap.
- Zero dividend yield and price near the top of the 52-week range leave little margin of safety.
- Sales and profit growth come off a very small base, so high percentages may not persist.
AI Analysis
When I look at Prerna Infra, my first reaction is caution. The market cap is ₹139 Cr, but the latest quarter shows sales of just ₹3 Cr and net profit of ₹1 Cr. The trailing P/E of 49.93 means I am paying roughly 50 times earnings for a business whose ROE is only 1.84% and ROCE only 2.36%. That is not the kind of capital-efficient franchise I want to own. Graham taught me that growth is only a margin of safety when it is backed by consistent earning power, not a low base. Yes, sales grew 118.25% and profit grew 322.50%, but the PEG of 0.23 is seductive yet almost meaningless when the absolute profits are so small. The book value is ₹29.68 per share, and the price is ₹38.39, so I am paying a 29% premium to book. I get no dividend yield. For a residential and commercial real estate player, asset values matter, but this is a competitive, cyclical business without an obvious moat. There are some positives: the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests improving financial health, and the debt/equity is not flagged, so leverage may not be an immediate danger. But with quarterly revenue of just ₹3 Cr, sustainability is unproven. This looks like a possible turnaround, not a durable growth business. I would wait for many more quarters of improving ROE and ROCE, and I would want the price to be at or below book value to compensate for the lack of stability. Today, the margin of safety is simply not there.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer