Vision Corpn. (531668)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3.51
Market Cap₹7.58 Cr
P/E Ratio1.43
ROCE22.4%
ROE-64.11%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-33.33%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-99.22%
52-Week Range₹2.4 — ₹3.95
SectorEntertainment
Book Value₹10.88

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me begin with the obvious: at ₹3.51, Vision Corpn is trading at a 68% discount to book value of ₹10.88. That looks like the kind of statistical bargain Graham would study. But then I look at the business and the numbers scream caution. Sales are down 99.22% from the previous year, and the latest quarter shows nil sales and nil profit. This is not a temporary slowdown; this is a company that has effectively stopped operating as a going film production and distribution business. A return on equity of -64.11% destroys my assumption that book value is a floor. At that rate, equity is evaporating, and the so-called asset value may be worth less than stated. The Piotroski score of 3 out of 9 confirms weak financial health. The P/E of 1.43 is meaningless when earnings are collapsing and net profit is negative on a quarterly basis. A 22.40% ROCE in isolation seems odd against a -64% ROE; I have no debt/equity data and no promoter-disclosure data to reconcile it. No dividend, no growth, and no score from FairStock due to insufficient data. In the film industry, content libraries and receivables are not like hard assets; their value can vanish with box-office failure or accounting write-downs. Graham taught me to buy a dollar for 40 cents, but only if the dollar is real and management has an incentive to unlock it. Here, I cannot verify that. Vision Corpn is a speculative asset play at best, not a business I can value with confidence. A further drop in book value or continued zero revenue would make even the asset thesis unsafe.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer