Rap Corp (531583)
Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹24.55 |
| Market Cap | ₹14.51 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0.45 |
| ROCE | -15.04% |
| ROE | 62.67% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 99.21% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹23.45 — ₹48.27 |
| Sector | Realty |
| Book Value | ₹105.9 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹24.55, Rap Corp looks like a classic Graham cigar butt: I am paying ₹15 crore for a business with a book value of ₹105.90 per share, so the price-to-book is only 0.23. On the surface, that seems to offer a substantial margin of safety. But I must ask what the book value is made of, and whether the business can earn an acceptable return on it. The reported ROE of 62.67% and P/E of 0.45 appear spectacular, yet they conflict with a negative ROCE of -15.04% and a latest quarter with sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹-0 Cr. When sales are zero and profit is zero, a P/E and profit-growth figure of 99.21% are statistical artifacts, not evidence of earning power. Graham taught me to prefer a business with stable earnings over one that looks cheap on paper but has no active operations. There is no dividend yield, no promoter-holding data, and no debt/equity figure, so I cannot judge whether this asset base is real, unencumbered, or independently valued. At half the 52-week high, the market is clearly not sharing my optimism. This is an asset play if the net assets can be realized, not a franchise. I would not rely on ROE or P/E here; instead, I need an audited balance sheet, a clear explanation of the assets, and evidence of what the company actually does. Until then, the cheapness is a trap or an opportunity, and I cannot distinguish the two with the data provided.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer