Disha Resources (531553)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹17.83
Market Cap₹13.18 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-0.68%
ROE-0.3%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth89.29%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
52-Week Range₹15.12 — ₹30
SectorCommercial Services & Supplies
Book Value₹49.62

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹17.83, Disha Resources sells for roughly 36 paise for every rupee of stated book value. Benjamin Graham taught me that buying below book can be a margin of safety, but only if the assets are real and management is trustworthy. This is not a wonderful business. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. The reported profit growth of 89.29% is a mirage because it starts from a negligible base. ROE is -0.30% and ROCE is -0.68%, so capital inside the company is not earning its keep. With zero revenue and no demonstrated earning power, I cannot rely on the income statement. The bull case must rest on the balance sheet: book value is ₹49.62 per share while the market cap is only ₹13 Cr. That gap is huge, but I have to question whether the book value is realizable. The Piotroski F-Score is 5/9, passable but not compelling. Debt/equity is not available, promoter holding is not available, and the FairStock score says insufficient data. In Buffett's vocabulary, I avoid situations where the thesis depends on unknown numbers. There is also no dividend, so I receive no income while waiting. This looks like a potential asset play, a possible cigar butt, but not a compounder. I would need audited financials, a clear list of assets and liabilities, and an explanation for the 64% discount to book. The margin-of-safety arithmetic is interesting, but an asset whose value cannot be confirmed is not a real margin of safety. I prefer certainty or a clear catalyst. Without either, Disha Resources remains a trading situation, not an investment.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer