Filmcity Media (531486)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹1.45 |
| Market Cap | ₹4.43 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -5.07% |
| ROE | -8.25% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -20% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1.7 — ₹3.78 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
| Book Value | ₹1.05 |
Strengths
- Stated book value of ₹1.05 per share provides tangible asset backing, even if earnings are negative.
- Market cap of ₹4 Cr means a single meaningful film or asset realisation could have outsized impact.
- Latest quarterly net loss is negligible (₹-0 Cr), so there is no acute cash drain.
- Price at ₹1.45 is only 1.38x book, not a high-multiple bubble on stated assets.
Concerns
- Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 suggests weak overall financial health.
- Zero sales and near-zero profit mean there is no earnings power; P/E is meaningless.
- ROE of -8.25% and ROCE of -5.07% indicate ongoing destruction of shareholder value.
- Promoter holding and debt/equity are undisclosed, creating transparency risk.
AI Analysis
Let me apply the same test I would use for any business: Can I understand it, does it earn good returns on capital, and am I buying below intrinsic value? Filmcity Media fails all three. At ₹1.45, the entire company is worth just ₹4 Cr. With sales of ₹0 Cr and a latest quarterly net profit of ₹-0 Cr, there is no earnings stream to capitalise. The P/E of 0.00 is meaningless; this is not a going concern with positive profits. Return on equity of -8.25% and ROCE of -5.07% show that the assets are shrinking shareholder wealth, not creating it. Piotroski F-score of 2/9 reinforces deteriorating financial health. The only tangible support is book value of ₹1.05 per share. But paying ₹1.45 means a P/B of 1.38—a premium of 38% over stated book. For a company earning negative returns, I demand a discount, not a premium. There is no dividend to compensate while I wait. Profit growth has fallen 20%, and the stock trades below its 52-week low of ₹1.70; that is a falling knife, not an opportunity. With promoter holding and debt/equity not disclosed, I cannot trust the numbers I don't see. Film production is a hit-driven business with no moat; without a track record of revenue or profitable films, there is no way to estimate future cash flows. Would I be better off leaving this alone? Yes. The margin of safety Mr. Graham taught us is absent. This is a speculative asset play at best, and a poor one. If the company can someday show real sales and positive returns on capital, I will revisit. Until then, ₹4 Cr of hope is not an investment.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer