Radix Industries (531412)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹163.25 |
| Market Cap | ₹246.27 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 84.11 |
| ROCE | 18.76% |
| ROE | 17.18% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% |
| Profit Growth | 42% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 11.49% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹165.15 — ₹226.4 |
| Sector | Personal Products |
| Book Value | ₹13.62 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹163.25 with a market capitalisation of ₹246 Cr, Radix Industries is not a stock I could call cheap. A P/E of 84.11 and a P/B of 11.99 demand perfection, and Graham always warned against paying such prices for anything less. The business has some good numbers: ROE of 17.18%, ROCE of 18.76%, and a Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9. That suggests a reasonably healthy small company. Profit growth of 42% looks impressive on the surface, but sales growth is only 11.49%; earnings are rising much faster than revenue, which makes me wonder whether this is real compounding or cost-cutting and one-offs. The latest quarter tells the scale: sales of just ₹17 Cr and net profit of ₹1 Cr. At a market cap of ₹246 Cr, you are paying an enormous multiple for a very small personal care player competing against giant brands. The dividend yield of 0.26% offers almost nothing while you wait. The stock is below its 52-week low range of ₹165.15-₹226.40, and promoter holding data is not available; for a value investor, unknown ownership is a red flag. FairStock also returns insufficient data, so I lack the information to build a margin of safety. This could be a fast grower in the making, but I cannot ignore valuation and visibility. Until sales growth catches up and the price gives me some protection, I would rather stay patient and watch from the sidelines.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer