CitiPort Fin. (531235)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹17.3 |
| Market Cap | ₹5.64 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 49.25 |
| ROCE | 4.17% |
| ROE | 7.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹17.5 — ₹52.94 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹8.95 |
Strengths
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests reasonable financial health across profitability, leverage, and efficiency measures.
- Positive book value of ₹8.95 provides some tangible equity base, even though earnings are currently absent.
- The stock has already corrected sharply from ₹52.94 to ₹17.30, removing some speculative froth.
- Tiny market cap of ₹6 crore leaves room for potential control or restructuring interest, though this is speculative.
Concerns
- Latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 and net profit of ₹0, meaning there is no visible operating engine today.
- P/E of 49.25 and P/B of 1.93 imply an expensive valuation for a business with zero growth and no dividend.
- ROCE of 4.17% is below any reasonable cost of capital, while ROE of 7.60% is inadequate for the risk.
- Promoter holding and debt/equity are N/A, making governance and leverage impossible to assess.
AI Analysis
Let me be honest: I don't like to invest in puzzles. CitiPort Fin is a microcap NBFC, market cap just ₹6 crore, price ₹17.30, and yet the latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 and net profit of ₹0. That means the business is not doing anything right now. A P/E of 49.25 tells me the market is still pricing prior earnings, but with zero growth and zero dividend, I need tangible evidence before paying such a multiple. Graham would say price is what you pay, value is what you get. Book value is ₹8.95, so at ₹17.30 I'm paying nearly twice book for a company earning a 7.60% ROE and an ROCE of only 4.17%. That return doesn't even cover the cost of capital, so the franchise has no economic moat. The PEG of 0.12 is a classic example of a meaningless ratio when the growth rate is actually zero. The stock has fallen from ₹52.94 to ₹17.30 in a year; a falling stock is not automatically a bargain. The only positive I can see is the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, which suggests the balance sheet hasn't badly deteriorated. But for an NBFC, debt/equity, promoter holding, and the FairStock Score are all unavailable. Without full details on the loan book and leverage, I cannot trust even that score. This may be a turnaround candidate, but a turnaround requires proof: revenue, profit, and disciplined management. Today I see none. When data is insufficient, the intelligent investor simply passes. I would wait for evidence of operations, and I would only revisit if the price fell meaningfully below conservative book value.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer