Visagar Finan. (531025)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.89 |
| Market Cap | ₹51.97 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 1.62% |
| ROE | -2.81% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 58.24% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -73.97% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.25 — ₹0.89 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹1.13 |
Strengths
- Trades at a 21% discount to book value with P/B of 0.79 against book value of ₹1.13
- Latest quarter is profitable: ₹3 Cr sales and ₹1 Cr net profit
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some fundamental improvements
- ROCE is positive at 1.62%, indicating marginal operational viability
Concerns
- Sales fell by 73.97%, showing severe business contraction
- ROE is negative at -2.81%, so shareholder equity is not earning its keep
- P/E of 0.00 reflects negligible or negative trailing earnings
- Promoter holding is undisclosed, creating serious transparency risk for retail investors
AI Analysis
The first thing I see is a tiny financial firm selling at 89 paise against book value of ₹1.13, a 21% discount. At ₹52 crore market cap, it's too small for most institutions, so I need to be extra careful. A low price-to-book ratio alone doesn't excite me; I need evidence that the book value is real and that the business can earn a decent return on it. Here ROE is -2.81%, meaning the equity is currently destroying value. Revenue collapsed by 73.97% from the prior year, which is a massive red flag — shrinking businesses often shrink for a reason. ROCE is only 1.62%, so operational returns barely cover the cost of capital. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹3 crore and net profit of ₹1 crore, and the Piotroski F-score of 6 hints at improving fundamentals. Profit growth of 58.24% sounds good, but from this tiny base it doesn't prove a durable turnaround. P/E being 0.00 simply means trailing earnings are negligible or negative, so I can't value it on earnings. There is no dividend, so I get no income while waiting. Graham taught me to demand margin of safety in both assets and earning power. A 0.79 price-to-book ratio offers some asset protection, but not enough if profits stay this weak. Also, promoter holding is not available; for a retail investor, that's a serious transparency problem. I'd watch this as a potential asset-backed turnaround, but I won't commit capital until I see sustained sales, positive ROE, and clear shareholder communication.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer