SSPDL Ltd (530821)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹18.73 |
| Market Cap | ₹24.22 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 3.3 |
| ROCE | 0.4% |
| ROE | -325.74% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 658.12% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 7,247.37% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹9.5 — ₹23.7 |
| Sector | Realty |
Strengths
- Latest quarter profitable: ₹14 Cr sales and ₹9 Cr net profit
- Low headline P/E of 3.30 against a small ₹24 Cr market cap
- Sales growth of 7,247% and profit growth of 658% show strong momentum
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests improving financial health
Concerns
- ROE of -325.74% indicates a severely impaired or negative equity base
- ROCE of just 0.40% shows almost no real return on capital employed
- Book value and debt-to-equity are unavailable, so asset margin of safety cannot be assessed
- Zero dividend and unknown promoter holding reduce transparency and shareholder return
AI Analysis
At ₹18.73, with a market cap of just ₹24 crore, SSPDL initially looks like a deep-value spreadsheet play. A trailing P/E of 3.30 and a latest quarter that delivered ₹14 crore in sales and ₹9 crore in net profit would make any Graham-style investor sit up. But I have learned that the cheapest number on a screener is often hiding the real story. The 7,247% sales growth and 658% profit growth are optically spectacular, yet percentage growth from a tiny or recovering base can mislead. More important, the return on equity is -325.74% and return on capital employed is only 0.40%. That is not a business with durable earning power; that is a business with a distorted capital structure and an extremely thin return on the capital actually invested. The fact that book value and debt-to-equity are not available is a serious handicap. As Ben Graham would say, asset backing is part of the margin of safety, and here I cannot even verify it. Real-estate earnings are lumpy: one project completion can create a profit spike, but the next quarter may look very different. The Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 does suggest some recent improvement in fundamentals, which keeps this on my watchlist. Still, there is no dividend, promoter holding is unknown, and the 52-week range of ₹9.50 to ₹23.70 confirms the speculative nature. I would want to see this profit repeated over several quarters, the equity repaired, and ROCE meaningfully above zero—not just one quarter of excitement. In its current form, this is a possible turnaround, not a proven compounder. I cannot call a business with negative returns on equity a wonderful business. For me, it is too close to speculation, and a low price alone is not enough to buy.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer