Ludlow Jute (526179)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹81.07
Market Cap₹88.07 Cr
P/E Ratio12.38
ROCE-0.56%
ROE11.11%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth231.92%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth158.82%
52-Week Range₹162 — ₹454.2
SectorPaper, Forest & Jute Products
Book Value₹133.49

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹81.07, Ludlow Jute is selling at 0.61 times book value of ₹133.49, giving me a classic Graham-style margin of safety on the balance sheet. The P/E is 12.38 and reported profit growth is 231.92%, with sales growth of 158.82%. But I must be sceptical: huge percentage growth usually means a tiny base. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹136 Cr but net profit of only ₹3 Cr, a margin under 2.2%. ROCE is -0.56%, which tells me the underlying business is not yet earning a satisfactory return on capital. ROE at 11.11% is acceptable but not outstanding. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some balance-sheet and operational improvement, but this is still a commodity jute manufacturer, not a franchise with pricing power. There is no dividend, so the investor is entirely dependent on asset realisation or earnings recovery. The 52-week range of ₹162-₹479 versus the current price of ₹81.07 is alarming and tells me the market has lost confidence; I need to know why. Promoter holding is not available, which is a red flag for governance and skin-in-the-game. I would not call this a fast grower despite the PEG of 0.06, because growth quality is questionable. Rather, I see a potential asset play: the stock is below book value with a low P/E, but the negative ROCE means the jute assets may not be earning their keep. For a Graham investor, a discount to book is only a starting point; you must ask whether the assets are productive and whether management can improve returns. If not, value can remain cheap for years. I would keep it on my watchlist, not in my portfolio.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer