iStreet Network (524622)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹4.22
Market Cap₹9.45 Cr
P/E Ratio53.39
ROCE150%
ROE-267.99%
Dividend Yield0.25%
Profit Growth1,000%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
52-Week Range₹14.76 — ₹72.15
SectorIT - Services

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let's begin with what the numbers do not tell me. Book value is missing, debt-to-equity is missing, promoter holding is missing. In Graham's world, incomplete information is not an opportunity; it is a warning. The stock trades at ₹4.22, yet its 52-week range is ₹14.76 to ₹72.15. That means investors have seen the value of this IT-enabled services business collapse by 70% or more from the low end of that range. That is not a normal pullback; that is possible distress or data inconsistency. The reported return on equity of -267.99% is horrific. It suggests shareholder equity is negative or being eroded quickly. A company that earns a 150% return on capital while destroying equity at this rate does not make sense; one of these numbers is wrong or incomplete. The latest quarter's net profit of ₹1 Cr on sales of ₹25 Cr is a thin 4% margin. The profit growth of 1000% sounds exciting, but with sales growth of 0%, this is a base-effect. The P/E of 53.39 means you are paying over 50 times trailing earnings, while the PEG ratio of 0.05 relies on a profit growth rate that cannot persist without revenue growth. The Piotroski F-score of 6/9 is moderate, but not enough to overcome the lack of a clean balance sheet. A dividend yield of 0.25% offers no support. In short, this is not a business I can confidently value. It might be a speculative turnaround, but Graham taught us to buy with a margin of safety, not to speculate on hope. Until book value, debt, and promoter ownership are available, and until sales growth confirms the profit recovery, I can only watch from the sidelines.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer